Back in the day, controller candidates were trained in a four-week basic orientation course, then given some archaic non-radar training that involved cognitive skills related to real-world ATC, and they were quickly screened on those skills.
Now there is the Air Traffic Collegiate Training Initiative – aka AT-CTI, aka CTI Program. (More info here). The earnest wantobees attend a college that charges them tuition and the students buy a degree in air traffic control. There’s more than thirty colleges getting in on this. There are no standards for what this higher education contains, except that it must duplicate the four-week OKC basic orientation course. Four weeks, four years, close enough.
Let me say that three of the CTI schools do a great job. They’ve been at it for a long time, they know what they’re doing and they go well beyond the standards. Their graduates are in great demand in the field. UND, ERAU, and CCBC-BVI are exceptions.
There is no more early screening. No school is motivated to turn away a tuition-paying student enrolled in a new program. OKC doesn’t screen anymore. The screen happens in the real world with live traffic.
The CTI graduates spend years of their lives, and fortunes in tuition, to join the career field. If they don’t get hired, or if they don’t succeed, there’s not much else to do with that ATC degree except to pay off the student loans.
You’d think that somebody would tell these students and their parents about Staffed Virtual Towers, Automated Virtual Towers, Staffed NextGen Towers, Automated NextGen Towers, and the resulting changes in their chosen profession.
There’s people paying for college now, in over thirty schools, who’ll be displaced by splitting towers, combining approach controls, contracting towers, and remoting and automating towers. There’s a lack of integrity in this.
Their option will be to go work for lower-paying contractors. Once again, we’re building a workforce for our competitors.

I worked for 3 months as an instructor at the Academy back in 2008. I concur with your assessment. If a student was from either North Dakota or Embry-Riddle you could bank on them being sharp. Every other school was hit or miss. I heard some sad stories of incompetence from individuals who had attended a school in New York.
But as you pointed out, what does it matter? They all pass the Academy anyway.
“They all make it” is not true…. the washout rate at OKC is around 46%.
TW – we must have worked together. I’ve been at the FAA Academy since 2008. While we may disagree about which schools are on top of the list, some are definitely better at taking tuition than delivering any viable skills.
For what it’s worth, North Dakota and Beaver are at the top of my list for preparing students.
CP
And another word – NOT ALL STUDENTS WHIZ THROUGH! Just ask the parents who call to ask us what their sons and daughters will do with their $60,000 ATC Degree after they failed the Performance Verification (PV). Rare, but it DOES happen, even to grads from the better schools.
CP
46% washout? Hmmm I don’t believe that for a second.. Every class I went out with washed one or two out of 18… So there would have to be classes washing 80% out to make that average..
On a side note.. I am pissed they hired ots ahead of me when they said you had to be ex mil or cti to get tge job.